Anthropic未发布模型在数学最大未解难题之一上取得进展

An unreleased Anthropic model made progress on one of math's biggest unsolved problems | TechCrunch TechCrunch Desktop Logo TechCrunch Mobile Logo Latest Startups Venture Apple Security AI Apps Disrupt 2026 Events Podcasts Newsletters Search Submit Site Search Toggle Mega Menu Toggle Topics Latest AI Amazon Apps Biotech & Health Climate Cloud Computing Commerce Crypto Enterprise EVs Fintech Fundraising Gadgets Gaming Google Government & Policy Hardware Instagram Layoffs Media & Entertainment Meta Microsoft Privacy Robotics Security Social Space Startups TikTok Transportation Venture More from TechCrunch Staff Events Startup Battlefield StrictlyVC Newsletters Podcasts Videos Partner Content TechCrunch Brand Studio Contact Us Image Credits: Samuel Boivin/NurPhoto / Getty Images AI An unreleased Anthropic model made progress on one of math’s biggest unsolved problems Russell Brandom 9:25 AM PDT · August 11, 2026 For more than 150 years, the Riemann hypothesis has stood as one of the major unsolved problems in mathematics, a long-running mystery about the distribution of prime numbers. There is currently a $1 million bounty for a working general proof of the hypothesis, which remains unclaimed. Contemporary AI models still can’t solve it either — but they can make a lot more progress than you might expect, a finding that’s likely to reopen longstanding questions about contemporary AI’s ability to discover new scientific and mathematical ideas. On Monday , Anthropic announced that an as-yet-unreleased model had made significant progress on the Riemann hypothesis, significantly increasing the lower bound of solutions for which the hypothesis holds true. Even more impressive is how the progress was made: An Anthropic staff member without significant mathematical training prompted the model to “take a real stab” at proving the hypothesis, then left the model to coordinate the task across the following day and a half. All told, the model tested 650 different ideas for solving the problem, coordinating across 60 subagents and spending 31 million output tokens in total. “Out of the 60 subagents, two were responsible for developing the key mathematical ideas,” a footnote to the paper explains, “13 contributed ideas to these agents, 30 attempted (but were unable) to develop new ideas, 13 served as validators to check the correctness of the arguments, and the final two helped to write the initial paper.” The finding was confirmed by two of Anthropic’s in-house mathematicians, and formalized using the open source proof assistant Lean . This is the latest in a string of mathematical breakthroughs led by large language models, or LLMs. A number of Erdos problems have been solved by AI models over the course of this year, and the release of more powerful models has led to more impressive results. OpenAI recently released a set of 10 major results proved by its internal “Astra” model, while a separate effort from Anthropic disproved the longstanding Jacobian conjecture. The growing body of results has caused both excitement and concern in the mathematical field. In a public declaration signed in June , a group of prominent mathematicians raised concerns that AI could undermine critical values of the field — particularly the standard that true mathematical proofs should be “attributable to specific authors who take credit for their discovery and assume responsibility for their correctness.” But the field is still split on how mathematicians should approach the new research techniques. In a blog post responding to the declaration , Fields Medal winner Timothy Gowers questioned whether the influence of AI might change mathematics in a more complex and positive way. “If we arrive at a world where mathematical theorems are no longer associated with mathematicians, maybe that won’t be any more problematic than the fact that stars aren’t named after astronomers and most aren’t named at all,” Gowers wrote. Topics AI , Anthropic , mathematics When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence. Russell Brandom AI Editor Russell Brandom has been covering the tech industry since 2012, with a focus on platform policy and emerging technologies. He previously worked at The Verge and Rest of World, and has written for Wired, The Awl and MIT’s Technology Review. He can be reached at russell.brandom@techcrunch.com or on Signal at 412-401-5489. View Bio October 13 – 15 San Francisco Scale faster. Grow your portfolio. Gain practical expertise. No matter your goal, Disrupt can empower you. Save up to $300 toda y! REGISTER NOW Most Popular Some Claude users are mad that Anthropic’s new watermarks will catch them using it at their jobs, classes Lucas Ropek Phoebe Gates and Sophia Kianni reportedly knew Phia was ‘cookie stuffing’ for months Dominic-Madori Davis Delta investigating after someone set up fake Wi-Fi network mid-flight Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai Anthropic says it will watermark text generated by its AI models Ivan Mehta Mark Zuckerberg’s AI manifesto is exactly why people don’t like AI Russell Brandom YouTube now requires creators to have twice as many watch hours to start earning money Aisha Malik This ‘adversarial’ pattern can prevent surveillance cameras from detecting you Zack Whittaker Loading the next article Error loading the next article X LinkedIn Facebook Instagram youTube Mastodon Threads Bluesky TechCrunch Staff Contact Us Advertise Site Map Terms of Service Privacy Policy RSS Terms of Use Code of Conduct Made by Google Phia Blacksmith Pixel Tag Disrupt 2026 Tech Layoffs ChatGPT © 2026 TechCrunch Media LLC.